Jack Edwards talks with Dale, Michael and Jerry Thornton and drops the bomb on us that based on how the standings look now, the Bruins could miss the playoffs this season.

[0:02:58] ... an enormous amount. Okay one of the rumors yesterday was. He was Chris Kelly. Malcolm Superman. A first round pick and dug him and Doug Hamilton for Taylor Hall too much or is that what does ...
[0:06:38] ... an X-Factor on creaky right. And that was very important that was Jarome Iginla. Craig he has more time and space and now we achieved because they botched her because there's just. Too much real estate ...
[0:09:52] ... schedule in the early part of the seat in which your drive Claude Julien and the opportunity. To. Get practice time. And yet. Spare parts up to speed in April and so so the brought were ...
[0:16:57] ... Has been like Mikey on the Red Sox. Jack Edwards will love Zdeno Chara and talks about you know how great he is this the toughest position to play. It all Swartz one of the cup ...






Keep dreaming. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Keep dreaming. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

The Bruins aren’€™t great and they aren’€™t going to be unless they make some sort of move. Here are some thoughts and some speculation, which I hate doing:

– As you’€™ve probably heard by now, the Oilers might not love Taylor Hall so much. He’€™s one of the best wings in the world and makes $6 million a year through 2019-20.

Sean Gentille of The Sporting News did a post on Hall and floated an idea of what it would cost to get Hall, with Dougie Hamilton, Malcolm Subban, Chris Kelly and a first-rounder making up his speculated package.

I wouldn’€™t trade Hamilton and the internet more or less agreed, but Gentille wasn’€™t wrong in suggesting that’s what it would take. Assuming the Oilers come close to knowing what they’€™re doing, Hamilton is the guy they should want if they were ever to talk trade with the B’€™s. Again, I wouldn’€™t do it.

Another thought on Hall: If the Bruins were to get him –€” which, no –€” you’€™d have to get rid of Milan Lucic or Brad Marchand, as Hall is a top-six left wing and so are they. Both Lucic and Marchand have modified no-trade clauses.

– My media buddy who thinks trading Tuukka Rask should be in play at any point ever is a nice person and also an incorrect person.

– It’€™s whizz or get off the pot time with Loui Eriksson. Either play him on a top line with David Krejci or trade him.

Eriksson’€™s a great third-line player who hasn’€™t gotten a long look with Krejci and Milan Lucic since he got to Boston. He doesn’€™t score, but the Bruins can either learn that he can with Krejci or they can see if there’€™s a team out there that believes he’€™s being underutilized with the B’€™s.

Once Krejci is back, the Bruins’€™ concern shouldn’€™t be breaking up their third line. It should be finding out whether they have the makings of a good first line.

– I have no idea what Ryan Spooner’s trade value is, but the Bruins would be able to get a lot if any of their fans became general managers.

– Eriksson also has trade protection. The Bruins with either no-trades, partial no-trades or no movements are: Patrice Bergeron, Lucic, Krejci, Marchand, Eriksson, Marc Savard, Chris Kelly, Zdeno Chara, Dennis Seidenberg and Rask.

– Though the Bruins (less than $1 million in cap space) have to move a player who makes decent money in order to add anyone who makes decent money, their obvious area of strength when it comes to trade assets is affordable young defensemen. Dougie Hamilton should be the only one who they consider untouchable.

– Players cost money. You can’€™t say “€œJust get rid of Kelly ($3 million cap hit) and Bartkowski ($1.25 million cap hit) and you’€™ll have $4.25 million to spend.” Wrong. Someone has to take those roster spots, so assuming you moved two players to make room for one player, you’€™d still need to account for whoever would take that second player’€™s spot, so subtract at least $800,000-plus per additional player moved to get a decent idea of how much money they’€™d actually save. The league minimum is $550,000.

That’€™s why, in the case of slightly overpaid low-money guys (Gregory Campbell makes $1.6 million, Bartkowski makes $1.25), getting rid of a bunch of them really won’€™t save you a lot.

– Kelly is one of the few guys on this team with an apparent pulse. I wouldn’€™t be in any hurry to trade him.

– The Bruins had to stick Torey Krug and Reilly Smith with below-market one-year deals of $1.4 million this season. Both should be in their long-term plans, but they’€™re going to have a hard time paying all of their free-agents to be (RFAs Hamilton, Krug and Smith, UFA Carl Soderberg). If they can’€™t pay them all, they’€™d be plenty attractive to other teams.

Blog Author: 
DJ Bean

The Bruins lost the battle of really, really good Finnish goalies Tuesday as they began their three-game road trip with a 3-2 shootout loss to the Predators (box<

Pekka Rinne gave the Bruins trouble all night Tuesday. (Getty Images)

Pekka Rinne gave the Bruins trouble all night Tuesday. (Frederick Breedon/Getty Images)

The Bruins lost the battle of really, really good Finnish goalies Tuesday as they began their three-game road trip with a 3-2 shootout loss to the Predators (box).

Tuukka Rask had to bail out the Bruins throughout the night, but Pekka Rinne stood every bit as tall on the other end before stopping Brad Marchand, Reilly Smith and Patrice Bergeron in the shootout. Derek Roy scored the only goal of the shootout for the Predators.

Rask had 38 saves on the night, with Rinne stopping 33 of the 35 he faced from the B’€™s.

With the shootout loss, the Bruins fell to 15-13-3. They are now 8-9-3 on the season without David Krejci, who sat again Tuesday.

Here are four more things we learned Tuesday night:

REILLY SMITH IS A STREAKY GOAL-SCORER

Smith scored an absolute beauty of a goal in the third period, going past James Neal to the net and stickhandling backhand to forehand and sliding it across, off the post and in. The goal gave him eight on the season to tie Brad Marchand for the team lead.

The goal was also Smith’€™s fourth tally in the last five games after going 10 straight games without a point. He scored in two straight games prior to that point-less stretch.

This isn’€™t the first example of streakiness from Smith with the Bruins, of course. He raced out to 18 goals in the first 52 games of last season before scoring just twice more over the next 30 games.

MILAN LUCIC GIVETH, MILAN LUCIC TAKETH A BAD PENALTY

Lucic scored his sixth goal of the season when he got the Bruins on the board following the expiration of a power play in the second period. He was relentless in front of the net, jumping on a rebound of a Chris Kelly shot and then getting his own rebound to eventually bury a third-chance effort past Pekka Rinne.

That was the good Lucic. The bad came late in the period when he took a painfully obvious hooking penalty against Seth Jones in the offensive zone to give Nashville a power play with 1:01 remaining in the period. The penalty led to a Mike Fisher goal that game off a Shea Weber wrist shot with Fisher in front of Tuukka Rask.

The penalty was unnecessary and easily avoidable, as Lucic also cross-checked Jones when he got to him before providing ample stick-work.

The Lucic-Kelly-Cunningham line was also on the ice for Mike Ribeiro’€™s third-period goal. Lucic was called on a questionable slash minutes later.

Overtime was a mixed bag for Lucic, as he had a turnover in the defensive zone in overtime that led to a scoring chance that Tuukka Rask would stop. Later on the shift, he picked off a pass in the neutral zone and raced into the zone before being stopped by Rinne.

THE BRUINS GET THREE (3) POWER PLAYS

Claude Julien has lamented the lack of penalties called against opposing teams this season. Tuesday might have been the greatest night of his life.

The Bruins were give not one, not two, but three power plays Tuesday, marking the first time in six games that they got three cracks at playing with a man advantage. The B’€™s more or less wasted a pair of power plays from Colin Wilson high-sticking calls, but their second-period power play saw them land four shots on net, with Lucic’€™s even-strength goal coming shortly thereafter.

THEY STILL AREN’€™T PLAYING JOE MORROW

Reporters on hand for Tuesday’€™s morning skate expected Joe Morrow to be in the lineup after seeing him skate alongside Dennis Seidenberg for the non-contact practice. Apparently Claude Julien was just messing with everyone, as he kept Zach Trotman in the lineup and Morrow in the press box Tuesday night.

That makes it five of six games as a healthy scratch for Morrow, who has played well in his 15 games and has seemingly done nothing to earn himself press box time other than being a left-shot.

Claude Julien clearly likes Trotman a lot, and with Adam McQuaid working his way back from a broken thumb, ice time for Morrow could end up being even tougher to get.

Blog Author: 
DJ Bean
Seth Griffith

Seth Griffith

When players get called up to the NHL, it’€™s typical for them to play in lesser roles before working their way up to higher lines. It’€™s been the opposite for Seth Griffith.

With only scored three goals through their first three games of the season, the Bruins recalled Griffith from Providence to play on their first line with David Krejci and Milan Lucic. Griffith, a second-year pro, has been Krejci’€™s right wing in all 11 of Krejci’€™s games this season.

Yet Krejci, who may be nearing a return to the lineup, has missed a lot of time due to injury and the Bruins haven’€™t been as confident in Griffith as a first-line player when No. 46 hasn’€™t been centering him.

The last two games, Griffith has been on Boston’€™s fourth line in place of the absent Simon Gagne. Griffith, who scored as many as 45 goals in a season in his junior days, is not a prototypical fourth-line grinder. Protypical or not, however, he’s a fourth-liner.

“€œFor now,”€ Claude Julien said Monday. “€œWe don’€™t have any extra forwards and we’€™d still like to be able to see our fourth line be able to bring some offense, so that’€™s why we put him there. That line was actually pretty good with Simon Gagne, and Simon Gagne’€™s been a top-line player his whole career.”

With all due respect to Julien, that line was not pretty good. The trio of Gregory Campbell between Daniel Paille and Gagne struggled in much of its time together, though it turned a corner on this month’€™s California trip.

Going from a top-line to a bottom line can be quite the adjustment. For one, you have to deal with playing fewer minutes. In most cases, you’€™re also working with less skilled players around you and opposing different types of players. Elite scorers who skate on top lines can be easier to oppose when you have the puck, as many top-liners are there mostly on offensive merit. The bottom-six is a working man’€™s game.

Guys like Brad Marchand in 2010-11 had to hone their craft in such roles before graduating to higher lines.

“€œI think it’€™s just going to help me,”€ Griffith said. “It’€™s my first year in the league. You look at this whole lineup; everybody plays hard. It’€™s not like it’€™s really a fourth-line role. You’€™re playing the same.

“€œYou’€™re just trying to play hard every shift. If you want to be in this league a long time, you’€™ve got to learn to do little things like that. It’€™s just something that can help improve my game, if anything.”

The Bruins’€™ attempts at changing their fourth line from the Merlot Line days have been unsuccessful so far, and Griffith has been unsuccessful without Krejci so far. The 21-year-old has five points (three goals, two assists) when Krejci’€™s been in the lineup and two points (both goals) in 11 games without Krejci.

The Bruins have used Krejci on a couple different lines in practice over the last week, but Griffith hasn’€™t been a part of them. His return could either return Griffith to the first line or move him out of the lineup altogether (Craig Cunningham is more of a prototypical fourth-liner), but for now, Griffith will take whatever minutes he can get.

“Griff is a pretty smart player,” Julien said. “It’€™s not the same definition as what we had before ‘€” bang and crash and that kind of stuff ‘€” but that’€™s where he fits right now.”

Blog Author: 
DJ Bean

David Krejci will travel with the Bruins for their three-game road trip this week, Claude Julien said after Monday’€™s practice.

David Krejci will travel with the Bruins for their three-game road trip this week, Claude Julien said after Monday’€™s practice.

Julien did not indicate whether Krejci would play. The B’€™s have three games in the next four days beginning with Tuesday’€™s contest against the Predators.

“I hope so. I can’€™t guarantee that, though,” Julien said of Krejci playing. “I hope so.”

Krejci has missed the last 10 games and has been limited to just 11 games this season due to lower-body injuries. He skated on a four-man line with Milan Lucic, Chris Kelly and Craig Cunningham Monday.

The lines were as follows:

Marchand – Bergeron – Smith
Fraser – Soderberg – Eriksson
Lucic – Kelly – Krejci – Cunningham
Paille – Campbell – Griffith

When Krejci has been in the lineup, he has been productive and the Bruins have been successful. Krejci has three goals and seven assists for 10 points in 11 games, with the B’s going 7-4-0. The Bruins have gone 8-9-2 when Krejci has not been in the lineup.

For more Bruins news, visit weei.com/bruins.

Blog Author: 
DJ Bean

The Bruins have had plenty of built-in excuses this season if they wanted to use them.

The Bruins have had plenty of built-in excuses this season if they wanted to use them. They lost two of their best players from last season (Jarome Iginla in free agency and Johnny Boychuk via trade) and didn’t do anything to replace them. And they’ve had injuries pile up both at forward and on defense, with the prolonged absences of Zdeno Chara and David Krejci the most notable.

The Bruins aren’t using any of those as excuses, though. Despite all of that, they still expect to be a good team. For the first month or so of Chara’s absence, they were at least good enough to beat some bad teams and maintain control of a playoff spot.

Over the last few weeks, however, they’ve faced better teams, lost seven of nine and lost control of a playoff spot — while they are still eighth in the Eastern Conference in terms of point, they’re actually 10th in points percentage thanks to the fact they’ve played more games than the other bubble teams.

“We can look at all the excuses we want, but we haven’t been that type of a team and I don’t want it to be that type of a team,” Claude Julien said. “So instead of feeling sorry for ourselves, let’s get mad and let’s do something about it.”

Chara returned to the lineup Thursday night against the Blackhawks, but the Bruins have lost both games since then, erasing any dreams anyone had that his return would be some magical elixir.

Chara has looked OK at times — especially in the third period Thursday night — but it’s been obvious that he’s still not up to speed. He’s taken four penalties in two games, with his second penalty Saturday leading to an Ottawa power-play goal that tied the game at 2-2. Julien didn’t even use Chara in overtime Saturday, something that would be unheard of if Chara was playing like Chara.

With the rest of the team struggling as much as it is, the Bruins need Chara in top form as soon as possible. He knows that, and like the rest of the team, he’s not making excuses for why he isn’t there yet.

“The first guy, I’m looking at myself,” Chara said. “I’ve got to be better and I have to work to be at the top of my game. … I can be here and talking about how difficult it is, but that’s the way it is. My job is to get to that performance where I need to be as soon as I can, as quick as I can.”

Blog Author: 
Scott McLaughlin

The Bruins have searched for traction all season. (Rich Gagnon/Getty Images)The Bruins need the two Hs: health and help.