Bruins winger Matt Beleskey will be in the lineup tonight vs. Anaheim. (Bob DeChiara/USA Today Sports)

Bruins winger Matt Beleskey will be in the lineup tonight vs. Anaheim. (Bob DeChiara/USA Today Sports)

Matt Beleskey will be more than a spectator tonight when he visits his old stomping grounds for a pivotal tilt between the Bruins and Ducks.

A healthy scratch in two of the club’s last three games, Beleskey was confirmed as a go and subbed in for Tim Schaller by Bruins interim head coach Bruce Cassidy following the club’s well-attended optional skate at the Honda Center, and is expected to skate in Schaller’s spot on the fourth line with Dominic Moore and Riley Nash.

After a career-high 37 points with the Bruins a year ago, year two in Boston as a whole has been a challenging one for Beleskey, who has struggled to duplicate his success, with just two goals and five assists in 33 games played along with 23 games missed with a right knee injury.

But the 28-year-old hasn’t sulked or moaned about his situation.

“I think that’s really all you can do when you don’t play, is just work hard, and try and get better,” Beleskey said. “I’ve been working with the coaches, trying to work on the foot speed, get back from missing a lot of games – it’s taken me a bit to get going, but hopefully tonight I can make some strides and hopefully stay in the lineup.”

And the Bruins have to hope that a head-to-head against his former team could provide a lift, too.

A member of the Ducks for seven seasons, with 57 goals and 112 points in 329 games for Anaheim, Beleskey is trying to keep his eyes on the task at hand for his (somewhat) new club versus enjoying the memories made back then.

“We had a lot of fun here,” Beleskey, who left the Ducks for the Bruins two summers ago, admitted. “But I’m looking forward to getting two points tonight, hopefully coming back in the lineup and being able to contribute and play my game.”

Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson
The Bruins are 4-0-0 under Bruce Cassidy. (Stan Szeto/USA TODAY Sports)

The Bruins are 4-0-0 under Bruce Cassidy. (Stan Szeto/USA TODAY Sports)

Here’s something weird: According to, there are 15 teams that have a better chance to make the 2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs than the Bruins, who are currently given a 72.14 percent chance of making the 16-team dance. But that’s not the weird part. Of the 30 teams and their chances at lifting the Stanley Cup this June, only the Caps, currently given a 10.9 percent chance, have a higher number than the 8.7 percent given to the Bruins by’s scale.

It’s worth noting that the Bruins, who have not made the playoffs since 2014, would not make the playoffs if the season ended today, too.

It’s just the latest model that speaks to how the Bruins are viewed in the community as a team that’s been better than their luck and win-loss record has indicated through the first three legs of their season.


The ‘fancy stats’ back the Bruins up as one of the league’s most dominant puck-possession clubs at even-strength play (which has been a common factor for Cup-winning teams), with an NHL-best 55.4 Corsi-For percentage, but it’s their heinous shooting percentage (6.21 percent, the second-worst in the NHL) that has seemingly held them back for stretches throughout the year.

You could make the case that their shooting problems ultimately cost Claude Julien his job after 10 years on the job, too, but the early results under interim head coach Bruce Cassidy seem to speak for themselves at this point — be it that their luck has turned and/or that the team is creating better offensive chances under Cassidy — even after considering the small sample size.

Under Julien, the Bruins scored 141 goals on 1,899 shots (7.4 shooting percentage overall). The Bruins have scored 16 goals on 144 shots under Cassidy (12.6 shooting percentage). At that pace, or a goal every nine shots, the Bruins would need just 1,125 more shots to match their production in 55 games under Julien this season when they scored a goal every 13 shots.

And the Cassidy pace, which is noticeably better, along with an easier schedule for the stretch run (three remaining head-to-heads with the Senators could determine the B’s playoff fate) would be more than enough to push the Bruins back into postseason play.

From there, the Bruins would have an actual shot at the Stanley Cup beyond the hypotheticals of these graphs.

But it may come back down to matchups for the Black and Gold, too. You’d have to believe that the path of least resistance for the Bruins would come with either the second or third seed in the Atlantic Division for a first-round head-to-head with the Canadiens, Sens, Panthers, or Maple Leafs opposed to a first-round showdown with the top wild card Rangers or whatever other Metropolitan Division team is bumped out of their top three and into that spot like the Islanders were last year.

As the team’s run in 2013 proved, it’s about getting hot at the right time along with experiencing an uptick in your team’s luck.

Two things that have happened under Cassidy.

Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson
The Bruins and Avalanche seem unlikely to make a major trade. (Roy Chenoy/USA Today Sports)

The Bruins and Avalanche seem unlikely to make a major trade happen before the league’s Mar. 1 trade deadline. (Roy Chenoy/USA Today Sports)

Those of you still waiting for the blockbuster trade between the Bruins and Avalanche to go down can probably find something else to do.

In what’s been nearly two months of rumors linking the Bruins and Avs in talks for a major swap (with the Bruins targeting Colorado captain and former No. 2 overall pick Gabriel Landeskog), all has gone quiet on the trade front. That’s because each party seems fed up with the other’s unwillingness to either come up or down on their desired prices.

By now, it’s obvious what the Avalanche want from the Bruins, and it’s centered around first-year pro defenseman Brandon Carlo and more.

A 20-year-old native of Colorado Springs, Colo., the Avs’ interest in Carlo is obvious given the fact that the team is in dire need of a defensive upgrade and Carlo’s ability to compete at a top-pairing level as a rookie.

But a 6-foot-5 defenseman that can defend and skate as well as Carlo has in just his first season in the greatest league in the world do not grow on trees. And at less than $800,000 per year for two more years after this one thanks to his affordable entry-level contract, there’s no rush from Bruins general manager Don Sweeney to move that out of Boston.

Avalanche general manager Joe Sakic is not the first general manager to try, either.

Carlo seems to be near “untouchable” status for the Bruins right now according to one league source. They also noted that Sweeney already said no to one deal involving Carlo earlier this year, and that was for a somewhat established young defender in the Jets’ Jacob Trouba during Trouba’s holdout with the Jets. And if the Bruins were not moving Carlo for Trouba, which would have been a strength for strength swap, it should almost go without saying that they won’t move him for Landeskog.

That’s not to suggest that the Bruins did not covet Landeskog, however, as it’s believed they offered up 2015 first-rounder Jakub Zboril as a potential centerpiece of a Landeskog deal, but were turned down by Sakic and the Avalanche.

And the B’s decision not to go any higher sort of makes sense from their scope.

Although the 24-year-old Landeskog is a captain and a former Calder Trophy winner, the numbers show that he is on the way to his third straight statistical dip, with just 11 goals and 12 assists through 47 games played this season. And with 25 games left in their season, that would align Landeskog for a 17-goal, 35-point finish to his season. That would be an 18-point dip from the year before, a 24-point dip from the year before that, and a 30-point slide back from three years ago. Bad team or not, that’s ugly.

It’s not as if Landeskog has played with subpar linemates, either, as most of his season has been spent with Nathan MacKinnon or Matt Duchene as his center. Both Duchene and MacKinnon, by the way, are producing close to their career norms. So while a ‘fresh start’ is the go-to answer when it comes to the rationale for any trade involving Landeskog, his three-year slide has hinted that this may be closer to a reclamation project, and at $5.571 million ’til 2021, that’s one that the Bruins cannot afford.

Not at the expense of Carlo and further cap complications, anyways. And especially not with a significant raise due to come David Pastrnak’s way this summer, and with $11.5 million in projected cap space to sign Pastrnak and address six other free agents.

But just because the Bruins are unwilling to pay the price for Landeskog — which appears to focus on Carlo, an NHL player, and a first-round pick as the starting point — it doesn’t mean that the Bruins are not still searching for help now and down the road.

“I’d prefer to err on the side of a player that will integrate into us on the longer-term,” Sweeney said of his deadline plans. “Last year, we gave up draft picks. I wasn’t prepared to move players that I felt in the same regard that teams had asked for in order to get a higher-level rental or a different kind of rental. I’m not going to deviate from what I said. Are there players and we have a surplus? That’s what I want to try and evaluate and find out whether or not we can deal from a position of strength.”

Their desperation to make a deal has seemingly gone down, too, thanks to four straight wins under interim head coach Bruce Cassidy, and the placement of some mismanaged parts back into positions to succeed within the club’s forward ranks.

The Bruins have four more games before the Mar. 1 trade deadline.

Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson
Matt Beleskey has been a scratch in two of the last three games. (Kim Klement/USA Today Sports)

Matt Beleskey has been a scratch in two of the last three games. (Kim Klement/USA Today Sports)

Bruins winger Matt Beleskey has hit the proverbial reset button too many times to count this season. And rarely has it actually worked.

A scratch in two of the last three games (or half of the games coached by interim B’s coach Bruce Cassidy), Beleskey has missed time to a knee injury and has struggled to the tune of just two goals and five assists in 33 games this season. It seems tough to find the perfect fit to work the hardworking winger back into the mix too, especially before Beleskey’s return to Anaheim, where he played for the first seven years of his NHL career, on Wednesday night at the Honda Center.

The Bruins tried to find a different role for Beleskey last week when he stepped in for Tim Schaller. But Beleskey struggled to play his game in a fourth line role with Dominic Moore and Riley Nash, with just one shot in goal and a season-low 7:37 of time on ice (unless you count that injury-shortened night which ended after just six shifts and 5:27 of time on ice against Buffalo back on Dec. 3) in a 4-0 win over the Habs.

Schaller responded to the scratch with an impact in his next game out, with three hits and three blocked shots in just over 13 minutes of time on ice while often matched up against the Sharks’ Brent Burns. In other words, he doesn’t seem like a fit for the press box in the Black and Gold’s next contest, not after an effort like Sunday’s, anyhow.

So just what becomes the team’s go-to route to salvage Beleskey’s second year in town?

The spot initially believed to be Beleskey’s — on the left side of a second line combination with David Krejci and David Pastrnak, which was one of his most common lines a year ago — has been seized by first-year North American pro Peter Cehlarik.

While these fill-in situations tend to work themselves out as a player fizzles out (Austin Czarnik, Anton Blidh, and an entire roster of puck-moving defensemen saviors that came before Torey Krug), Cehlarik has looked damn impressive with Krejci and Pastrnak, and the line’s chemistry has seemingly led to magnet-like possession skills in the attacking zone and countless opportunities (and in different fashions). Ready for the ultimate compliment to Cehlarik, too? It’s been increasingly difficult to tell the difference between he and Marchand when on the ice, which is something that was originally because of Cehlarik wearing No. 83 and Marchand sporting No. 63, but it’s Cehlarik’s undeniable creativity along the walls once over the attacking blue line that has helped make that more than a numbers game. Carrying out a hypothetical that throws Cehlarik back to the press box (or back to the AHL) despite his budding chemistry with Krejci would only further complicate a year that’s been rife with chemistry issues and (or because of) a revolving door of linemates to the veteran Czech’s left. And his right, actually, for that matter.

Elsewhere, Marchand, the team’s top winger, is not coming out of the lineup. Nor is Frank Vatrano, who missed the first 34 games of the season due to a training camp foot injury that required surgery, coming off that third line or second power-play unit.

So, again, where’s the fit for No. 39? It’s hard to find a legitimate answer. But maybe that’s the wrong question, though, as for the 28-year-old Beleskey it may not be a where he fits back into the mix, but rather a when he’s fit for a jump back into action.

On the shelf for 23 games because of that aforementioned injury against the Sabres in December, which affected his right knee but did not require surgery (not to our knowledge, anyways), Beleskey’s skating game has been noticeably dull since his return. The numbers back that up, too, with just two assists, a minus-4 rating, and 13 shots in nine games played. It’s also been subtly hinted as that Beleskey is still not at 100 percent, healthwise or game-speed wise. And Beleskey has worked with the club’s skating coach at recent practices, which would indicate that it’s something that’s been acknowledged by both the player and the team.

But at some point this season, the Bruins will need the Beleskey that registered a career-best 37 points last year to show up.

Beleskey simply means too much to the Bruins in the ‘little areas’ of the game as a physical tone-setter to sit as a scratch when the games matter the most. I understand the unquantifiable nature of the buzzwords thrown out there in that last sentence, but it’s honestly hard for me to remember a player that’s loved a city and team as quickly as Beleskey has taken to Boston in just one and a half years here, so motivation or efforts, especially on a shift to shift basis, should never be in question. And in the second year of a five-year deal featuring a $3.8 million cap hit, he’s too expensive to become dead weight in the press box. (You thought people were mad when Jimmy Hayes’ $2.3 million sat as a scratch again and again?) One of the things that impressed the Bruins the most about Beleskey too was his monstrous postseason run with the Ducks in 2015, which featured eight goals — three of which held as game-winning goals — in 16 playoff games. Those are goals and results that the B’s will need, be it in the stretch run or in the actual playoffs, if this climb back from the near-dead under Claude Julien leads to a legitimate playoff run under Cassidy.

Production that can only come when Beleskey is back on the ice for the Black and Gold, not where.

Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson

Don Sweeney's biggest move will be the firing of Claude Julien.</p>
<div class=

The sample size is entirely too small to make any definitive statements one way or the other.

Brent Burns was stymied by the Bruins for much of the night. (Stan Szeto/USA Today Sports)

Brent Burns was stymied by the Bruins for much of the night. (Stan Szeto/USA Today Sports)

The sample size is entirely too small to make any definitive statements one way or the other. But it’s obvious that the Bruins — despite the positive results of three wins in as many games — have been a little ‘too open’ in the defensive zone under interim head coach Bruce Cassidy.

You could very well at times see a week’s worth of running around under Claude Julien in just one period from Cassidy’s group.

But the theme of the Cassidy Era, again as small of a sample as it has been, and in addition to the results, has been progress from one game to the next and actually applying the adjustments.

So when Cassidy’s Bruins returned from their bye for their second head-to-head with the Sharks in just over a week, the Bruins knew who they had to watch out for, and did just that in a 60-minute plus smother of Norris Trophy favorite (or perhaps inevitable is a better word, to be honest) Brent Burns.

It added up to another win for Cassidy’s improving Bruins, this one by a 2-1 overtime final over the Sharks at the SAP Center.

The Bruins opened the game’s scoring up at the 11:05 mark of the first period when Jimmy Hayes’ shot went wide, but bounced off the endboard and back to Ryan Spooner for an easy putaway tally for Spooner’s ninth goal of the season.

But in a second period that was more of a hang-on-for-dear-life stanza than the norm established under Cassidy, the Sharks finally countered the Spooner tally at the 17:37 mark when a Burns attempted shot took a fortunate bounce off Torey Krug’s skate and rolled towards Patrick Marleau for a by all means empty-net goal for Marleau.

It spoke to just how hard it is to contain Burns, who had over 15 shot attempts shortly into the third period, which is something that the club was able to do — as much as one can, anyways — in this game. Especially when the B’s flatlined as often as they did.

With less than five minutes to play in a tied game, Burns, who is just three points away from Oilers superstar Connor McDavid, was at 19 shot attempts and with six of them landing on net against Tuukka Rask, who finished with 29 saves on 30 shots against.

And as Burns finished the third period at 19 attempts, and it was onto overtime at the Shark Tank.

But Burns’ best chance came on shot No. 20, but as it was stymied by Rask, the Bruins had seen enough of the dangerous Burns, and took matters into their own hands with a faceoff win and set play that sent Brad Marchand in on an overtime breakaway.

It was then that Marchand danced into the San Jose zone before he tucked a puck through Martin Jones for the win.

Far from the prettiest night in terms of what the Bruins were able to create against Jones and the Sharks in the attacking zone, the biggest takeaway was the club’s ability to block shots, especially those from Burns, who finished the game with nine of his 20 attempts blocked by B’s skaters. And among the 23 blocks by the Bruins, eight came from the left wingers matched up against Burns throughout the night, including three from Tim Schaller, and four from left-side defender Kevan Miller.

With the win, the Bruins improved to 4-0-0 under Cassidy, and now have wins in four straight for the first time this season.

The Bruins are back at it on Wednesday night against the Ducks.

Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson

Like Robert Plant sang back in the day, Bruins GM Don Sweeney made up his mind to make a new start with a new voice behind the bench, and after a seven-day bye week, the Bruins are going to California with three wins in as many games under interim head coach Bruce Cassidy.

The Bruins take on the Sharks tonight at the SAP Center. (John Hefti/USA Today Sports)

The Bruins take on the Sharks tonight at the SAP Center. (John Hefti/USA Today Sports)

Like Robert Plant sang back in the day, Bruins GM Don Sweeney made up his mind to make a new start with a new voice behind the bench, and after a seven-day bye week, the Bruins are going to California with three wins in as many games under interim head coach Bruce Cassidy. OK, maybe it’s not exactly like Plant, but you get the reference.

There’s no much to harp on when it comes to the first three games of the Cassidy Era. The Bruins have scored goals at will — they have 14 goals in this three-game segment, including four from their defensive corps that have been encouraged to create more offense — and now it’s time for the Black and Gold to prove that the streak was not just the high of a coaching change and that this team has legitimately improved with a new voice behind the bench and some needed system tweaks.

But that’ll be awfully hard to do here, at least if recent history tells us anything about what the Bruins are in for against the Sharks, Ducks, and Kings.

Last season, the Bruins went 0-3-0 on this trip and were outscored 9-to-3. The year before that, the Bruins again went winless on their California swing and were outscored 12-to-6. A repeat of such a nightmare this season would by all means put the Bruins back in a situation that they have successfully clawed tooth and nail out of, and undo all the good that came with the Maple Leafs’ massive failure to take advantage of their games in hand advantage over the Black and Gold.

Tuukka Rask will be in net for the Bruins. Rask stopped 25 shots in his pre-bye finale, a 4-0 shutout win over the Canadiens, and enters action with four wins and a .902 save percentage in seven career games against the Sharks. Rask made saves on 23 of 26 shots thrown his way in a Feb. 9 victory over the Sharks back in Boston. And in a year that’s been short on rest for the 29-year-old goaltender, it will be interesting to see how he responds from a week of non-hockey activity. Rask does have a 7-2-0 record and .934 save percentage with three-plus days of rest this season.

The Sharks counter with Martin Jones. Pulled after the first period of Feb. 9’s 6-3 loss to the Bruins after he allowed three goals on 12 shots against, Jones is in dire need of a bounceback game after that aforementioned early hook against the B’s and a 16-of-22 overtime loss to the Panthers less than a week later. Jones has 28 wins and a .913 save percentage in 49 games this year.

This is the season series finale between the B’s and Sharks, and the Bruins have not won in San Jose since Jan. 2014.

Here are the expected lines and pairings for the Bruins…

Brad Marchand – Patrice Bergeron – David Backes

Peter Cehlarik – David Krejci – David Pastrnak

Frank Vatrano – Ryan Spooner – Jimmy Hayes

Tim Schaller – Dominic Moore – Riley Nash

Zdeno Chara – Brandon Carlo

Torey Krug – Adam McQuaid

Kevan Miller – Colin Miller

Tuukka Rask


Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson
The Bruins have power-play goals in eight straight games. (Christopher Hanewinckel/USA TODAY Sports)

The Bruins have power-play goals in eight straight games. (Christopher Hanewinckel/USA TODAY Sports)

After a stretch that included 50 games in just over 100 days, a week-long break was more than deserved for the Bruins.

But, as timing as a whole has often worked out for this group this season, it could not have come at a worse time. Not only did the B’s rattle off three wins in a row under interim head coach Bruce Cassidy to head into their bye week, but the Bruins rolled into the break with power-play goals in eight straight games.

Over that span, the Bruins have collected 11 power-play goals on 30 opportunities, or a 36.6 power play percentage.

It’s a hot streak that the Black and Gold have to be desperate to extend to nine games in spite of a seven-day layoff when they skate against the Sharks in San Jose as the kickoff to their California tour (and with a stop in Dallas before they return back to Boston) on Sunday night.

So much of the B’s man advantage success has come from a top-heavy first unit with Torey Krug and David Pastrnak on the points, Brad Marchand in front of the net, Ryan Spooner along the wall, and Patrice Bergeron as the noted ‘bumper’ between the circles. The Pastrnak addition to the top unit is a relatively new one for the Bruins, of course, but it’s one that has allowed David Krejci to move back down to the second unit for a more natural, patient touch when it comes to puck distribution for that group.

“I’d prefer to call them the Bergeron unit and the Krejci unit to be honest with you because my experience is that power plays are cyclical and you’re going to have some success as a team and then as groups,” Cassidy said when asked about the club’s dueling power-play units last week. “They’re red hot, the Bergeron group, no denying that. They work hard at it and the Krejci group works hard at it, they just need to find their chemistry because we are moving a few new bodies in there.”

One of the newest bodies to the mix, for over 20 games anyway, has been second-year pro Frank Vatrano.

The decision to put Vatrano, who has a quick shot and even quicker release, with a second unit that features not only Krejci but defenseman Colin Miller and with David Backes as the net-front presence, is an obvious one that predates Cassidy’s bump up to head coach (though Cassidy did run the B’s power play under Claude Julien), but one that’s still worked wonders for the club.

In Vatrano’s 24 games to date, the Bruins have scored 24 power-play goals on 82 opportunities, or a 29.3% percentage. Compare that to their 13-for-102 mark and 12.7% success rate (which stood as the second-worst in the entire league), before the shoot-first winger was activated from the injured reserve and it’s clear that No. 72 has made a major difference in the potency of their units.

 The chemistry has grown with more minutes, too, as the 22-year-old showed in the club’s 4-3 win over the Canucks last week.

Vatrano hasn’t been healthy all year, now [Peter] Cehlarik goes in and Backes came off the other group so they have got to find their rhythm and that’s one play that we’re going to look for is that seam,” Cassidy said. “Krejci to Vatrano because you got a guy that loves to pass that can see the ice and you got a guy that can get it off in a hurry. That’s plan A on that group if we find that.”

And for that unit, it’s about shots with a purpose in the time that they do get together, which will be hard to find given the effectiveness of that first unit, which has been responsible for eight of the team’s 11 power-play goals over the last eight games.

“I mean, we haven’t been getting much PP time lately,” Krejci said of Vatrano’s power-play goal in their win over the Canucks, which was Vatrano’s fourth power-play goal of the season. “Our first unit has been doing really good job and they’ve been scoring a lot, but it was nice for our unit to put the puck in, give us some confidence that we can do it as well.”

Krejci’s unit added another one the next night, too, with his own goal created off a some soft hand movement between Cehlarik and Backes at the front of the net, a move that doesn’t happen without some growing confidence from that unit.

Confidence that you hope didn’t rust over during the break.

Blog Author: 
Ty Anderson