11/18/09 09:47 EST
Look, it’s all fourth-and-2 here this week. And I suspect that some may view that as more of a warning than an invitation.
I understand. But at least dig in and give the mailbag a shot, even if you are suffering from fourth-and-2 fatigue. Lots of good email from both sides of the argument this week AND I manage to zipper in some Andrea Kramer talk, nominate a mayor for Cougar Town and defend Bruce Springsteen and the Wayans Brothers.
So join for me for a 5,000-word farewell to fourth-and-2. Why? Because to let go you must say goodbye. I think it was John Denver who wrote that. And if he didn't he should have.
To the ‘bag we go (and, as always, feel free to email away to kminihane@weei.com)
--
Kirk,
Look, the Dolts score from either 70 or 29 yards away. And the Patriots were more likely to make the first and win controlling the ball than they were in giving it back. It was at worst a 50-50 call that empowered the better half of the Patriots, the offense. I only would
11/16/09 03:19 EST
Did that just happen?
No, really. Did it?
Let’s get this out of the way: in terms of Boston sports history, what I just watched in the Patriots' 35-34 loss to the Colts ranks No. 3 on the all-time “Moronic Decisions By a Coach or Manager” list. I still have to give the nod to John McNamara's failure to remove Bill Buckner for defensive replacement Dave Stapleton (we are talking about a World Series vs. an important regular-season game) and Grady Little's blunder with Pedro Martinez (playoff situation), but this is an easy bronze medal winner.
Let’s get this out of the way, Part 2: I don’t care if Kevin Faulk was past the marker or not. Really not the point at all. He could’ve broken a tackle and turned it into a 72-yard TD and it STILL would have been an insane call. You can hit on 19 at a blackjack table and draw a 2, you know. Doesn’t mean it makes any sense.
(And I think Faulk actually had the first down, but it would’ve been
11/12/09 08:01 EST
Be warned: If you are a fan of Dan Dierdorf, Rajon Rondo, Jack Morris or Jim Corsi, this might not be the mailbag for you. Just being honest.
But that doesn't mean the rest of you shouldn't stick around and, to quote the great Pat Healey, "take a gander." Plenty of Patriots talk this week, of course. Also more Rondo/Chris Paul, I break out the Mute List, someone calls me out for not knowing something (pause for shock), and Andy Pettitte gets his turn on the Hall of Fame candidate wheel (next week, Kevin Romine!)
To the 'bag we go (and of course feel free to keep sending those e-mails to kminihane@weei.com) ...
--
Kirk,
I'd take Andre Johnson over [Randy] Moss myself but I know what you're saying, Kirk. But I think one mistake you're making is calling the Carolina game a lock. The Panthers beat Arizona last week and should have won at New Orleans [Sunday]. But I do agree that the AFC East is basically over.
Todd
A: Johnson is a terrific receiver, Todd, maybe the best in
11/09/09 12:21 EST
Here’s what Sunday’s 27-17 win over the Dolphins means for the Patriots.
It’s OK to take a look at the big picture again. First time since the season started when that feels safe, I know. But take a look.
For starters, you can book a playoff spot. In ink, even. Unlike last year, no 11-5 team is going to be left out (if the playoffs started today, the sixth seed in the AFC playoffs would be the Chargers, and they already have three losses), and I think 11-5 is about the worst record the Pats will end up with. Take a look at the last eight games:
At Indy
Jets
At New Orleans
At Miami
Carolina
At Buffalo
Jacksonville
At Houston
That Carolina/Buffalo/Jacksonville stretch seems like a pretty safe bet for a sweep, right? That’s nine wins right there. I think they beat both the Jets and Miami, but if you want, I’ll go with a split. That’s 10 wins. So they’d need to find one win in the remaining three games (Indy, NO, Houston) to get to