ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. -- He is the constant. When he does not feel good, he contributes. When no one else is hitting, he often is the one who seems intent on singlehandedly pulling the team out of its adversity. If there is a player who can be described as doing something every day to help his team win, he is it.
ALEX SPEIER
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Drip. Drip. Drip. And then the deluge.
The dam finally burst, as the Red Sox seemed intent on making up for a fortnight’s worth of failures with runners in scoring position over the course of a single inning. In a tie game in the top of the third inning, the Sox put runners on first and second with one out — precisely the sort of situation in which the team had failed so many, many times in recent days.
The team’s .179 batting average with runners in scoring position in May was the worst mark in the majors. That was complemented by a .283 OBP and .292 slugging mark in such circumstances, numbers that had yielded a horrendous offensive swoon — three or fewer runs eight times in a 12-game stretch. The futility had continued in the first two innings, with the Sox wasting a pair of doubles by going 0-for-3 with runners in scoring position.
But the Sox defied what had become their habit in that third inning, not just with a single exception but with a flood. Dustin Pedroia singled to right-center for a run. David Ortiz zinged a single to left for another run, with Rays starter David Price having to leave the contest with tightness in his left triceps. A lengthy pitching change did not stop the momentum, as Mike Napoli jumped on a Jamey Wright fastball and blasted it to the warning track in right-center for a two-run double. Jonny Gomes then stayed on a fastball and lined it up the middle for a another RBI single.
Then, after Will Middlebrooks briefly interrupted the string with a flyout, the Sox did not relent. Jarrod Saltalamacchia walked to load the bases, a prelude to a two-out grand slam by Drew.
In one inning, the Sox had five hits with runners in scoring position — the same number they’d had in 40 trips to the plate in such situations over their previous four games. The result? A feel-good win in which nearly every Red Sox player who stepped on the field could feel as if he made a positive contribution, and a 9-2 blowout win for a team in need of just such a day.
WHAT WENT RIGHT FOR THE RED SOX
– The four consecutive hits with runners in scoring position by Pedroia, Ortiz, Napoli and Gomes represented the team’s longest stretch of consecutive plate appearances without an out with runners in scoring position since April 24, when the team had five straight batters reach (four hits, an HBP) with runners in scoring position against the A’s.
– Drew continued to show steady extra-base pop in recent weeks. He pounded his third homer and fourth double of the year as part of a 2-for-3 game that also featured a walk, and now has eight extra-base tallies in his last 18 plate games. In that span, he’s hitting .317/.411/.571.
– Dustin Pedroia went 2-for-5 with a pair of singles and jumpstarted the Sox’ scoring in the third. He’s now amidst a seven-game hitting streak that has seen him collect multiple hits in six of those contests, hitting .517/.563/.571 in that time.
– Will Middlebrooks slammed a double and a solo homer (his seventh of the year), both to right-center — an excellent indicator that he’s rediscovered his approach after weeks of searching. He now has seven extra-base hits (six doubles and a homer) in his last six contests.
– Jon Lester did everything for which the Sox could have hoped once entrusted with an eight-run lead. He logged seven innings and allowed two runs on eight hits while striking out five. Though he hit a batter, he did not walk a batter for the second straight outing, and he filled up the strike zone with 74 of his 107 offerings (69 percent). He is now 4-0 with a 1.68 ERA in six starts following a Red Sox loss this year. He also surpassed Josh Beckett for sole possession of fifth place on the Red Sox’ all-time strikeout leaderboard with 1,110 punchouts for the club.
WHAT WENT WRONG FOR THE RED SOX
– Shane Victorino‘s 0-for-6 night included an 0-for-3 against left-handed pitchers. Victorino — who entered this season enjoying considerably greater success against southpaws than righties — is now hitting .227/.277/.318 against lefties. He was the only Sox starter to neither score nor drive in a run.
– Though Jarrod Saltalamacchia crushed a ball to deep left-center, Desmond Jennings tracked it down, and Saltalamacchia otherwise failed to make contact (two strikeouts and a walk) in his other three plate appearances. He thus had his five-game hitting streak snapped.
Red Sox right-hander Daniel Bard‘s command issues appear to be reaching the point of crisis in the most literal sense, as it seems almost impossible that he should remain in Double-A Portland while ensnared in a struggle for the strike zone that has become worse than anything he dealt with last year.
On Wednesday, Bard allowed a hit, walked five, unleashed two wild pitches and permitted two runs in one inning of work. He threw just eight of 30 pitches for strikes. The outing almost could have been deemed a positive step after Bard worked around a pair of walks in the sixth inning to limit the damage to one run by getting a double-play grounder and another groundout. But he returned to the mound for a second inning of work and walked all three batters he faced.
Bard threw strikes on just 27 percent of his pitches, his worst percentage of any outing in the last two years. In five appearances since returning to Double-A after a brief promotion to the big leagues, Bard has now thrown strikes on just 34 percent of his pitches. He’s walked 13 in 3 2/3 innings.
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — It’s been a period in which productivity has been glaringly absent. The Sox have now scored three or fewer runs in eight of their last 12 games, with their average of 3.3 runs per game in that span ranking 13th of the 15th teams in the American League.
So how to fix it? Manager John Farrell was asked whether he’d contemplated tinkering with the lineup. While he acknowledged considering the possibility of such a measure, he decided that he’d rather show more faith in a group that roared to one of the best starts in franchise history.
“I have given it some thought. And yet the one thing that I don’t want to create in there is more uncertainty,” said Farrell. “And I think at a time when you could understand if some frustration starts to filter in, I want there to be some stability and some continuity to the work that we’re doing. That includes they understanding that there’s a lot of belief and trust in them as players and we didn’t go to 20-8 at one point with a completely different set of players.
“We’re not going to run from them. I really like our team,” he added. “This is a group that’s talented and going to be very successful.”
Leadoff hitter Jacoby Ellsbury has been a considerable part of the team’s early struggles. He’s hitting just .256 with a .321 OBP and .363 slugging mark. In May, those numbers dip to .200/.290/.255.
The Sox recognize that Ellsbury is a singularly impactful member of their roster when he reaches base. But he’s been doing that so rarely that it seemed reasonable to ask Farrell if he might consider moving from his familiar spot as a leadoff hitter.
“Certainly there’s a track record in which to refer to. I know he’s working diligently to get back on track, particularly his timing at the plate,” said Farrell. “I do know this — when he does get on base, it changes our entire [complexion] — not only to start or lead off a game, but throughout the course of a given game, when he’s on base. Whether or not he’s in the leadoff spot, that’s one time. That’s the first at-bat. After that, I don’t want to say that we’re not creating opportunities for ourselves, but, to me, the more glaring thing is how we’ve created those opportunities and yet the ball hasn’t fallen our way.”
Another example of the manager’s commitment to lineup stability: Farrell said he wasn’t contemplating an alteration that would feature more of Daniel Nava against lefties at the expense of playing time for Jonny Gomes. Gomes unquestionably has struggled to date this year, hitting .182 with a .329 OBP and .318 slugging mark; Nava, meanwhile, has been one of the Sox’ top hitters overall, and he has a line of .238/.333/.524 with two homers against southpaws.
Despite the fact that Nava is outperforming Gomes in that specific role this year, however, Farrell did not hesitate to insert him into the lineup for a second straight game against a Rays lefty with dominant stuff. Gomes started against Matt Moore on Tuesday, and he’s in the lineup on Wednesday against David Price, with Nava sitting in both contests.
“I’m sure there’s been stretches in Jonny’s career where he might have gone through something similar,” said Farrell. “You can’t completely turn away from the bulk performance where he’s been very good against lefties. He’s had some success this year as well. I don’t think at this point we’re looking to abandon him or run away from him being in the lineup against lefties, and we’ve got a stretch tonight, two more in Minnesota and we’re likely to get another one in Chicago, so he’ll get more regular at-bats, if anything, to get going.”
So, the Sox will stay the course, mindful that they have a lineup that still leads the majors in extra-base hits, is second in OBP (.340) and ranks third in the AL in both average (.265) and slugging (.441). The team’s struggles with runners in scoring position (an AL-low .189 since the start of May after ranking third best in the big leagues in April with a .310 mark) have been costly during the team’s current struggles, but Farrell remains committed to the shape of his offense despite a difficult stretch.
OTHER RED SOX NOTES
– Andrew Bailey will throw a 12- to 15-pitch simulated game on Thursday after warming up for 15 pitches. The Red Sox will assess the next course of action for him on Friday — chiefly, whether he will appear in a rehab game or be activated during the weekend in Minnesota.
– Franklin Morales is slated to start on Saturday and throw four innings for Triple-A Pawtucket. Barring a short-term bullpen need, the Red Sox would like to get him one more start after that to get stretched out to as many as five innings.
In his weekly appearance on “Salk & Holley,” Wednesday afternoon, Red Sox skipper John Farrell said that despite the recent slump that has seen the team drop nine of its last 11, don’t expect any major shakeups, either in the rotation or the batting order.
Saying the most important thing to is “remain consistent,” he doesn’t anticipate making many changes, at least not at this point in the season.
In his weekly appearance on “Salk & Holley,” Wednesday afternoon, Red Sox skipper John Farrell said that despite the recent slump that has seen the team drop nine of its last 11, don’t expect any major shakeups, either in the rotation or the batting order.
Saying the most important thing to is “remain consistent,” he doesn’t anticipate making many changes, at least not at this point in the season.
“I think we’re still in that part of the year where we’re trying to maintain continuity and not just [making] reactionary moves because we’ve scuffled a little bit as of late,” he said. “That might be coming, but I think right now, I think it’s important for everybody in our clubhouse to know there’s stability, no one is panicking. And we’re going through a spell right now, where, you know what? We have to execute in those given moments.
“I think it’s important to remain consistent. It’s not to show that you’re going to revamp things completely, and then, that sends a mixed message. I’m more about talking to individuals,” he added. “I think the attitude of our club, our team, is still consistent as it was in April when things were falling our way, and yet, we’ve not fired on all cylinders in the three areas, pitching, defense and offensively, as we had done in the first month of the season.”
Here are some more highlights from Wednesday’s Q&A with the manager:
On the popup late in Tuesday’s game against Tampa … did it hit something or was it just that high up on a tough background?
“it did not hit anything. And amazing as it might sound, given the wires and speakers and things that hang from that ceiling, it found it’s way through some of those wires and you know what? I heard you just describe, when you think you’ve seen just about everything in this game, it ends up being a 75-foot popup that lands and sticks just inside the foul line and the two runs score. You know what? An oddity, but still, inside this ballpark, it’s certainly a fair ball.”
How much time to do you spend in this ballpark on preparing for such a strange place for baseball?
“The one thing we do going into every series, we talk about ballpark characteristics. Here you’ve got the four rings that are in the ceiling here — the first two are in play. The third and fourth ring, those are home runs if they’re hot. You talk about the characteristics. The thing you really can’t replicate until you get out there is tracking fly balls and pop ups on a background that is very different. That’s not an excuse — everybody in our clubhouse has played in this ballpark before. It comes in a situation where it ends up being the difference in the game.”
On no one taking charge on the fateful popup:
“I just think it was lost in the backdrop of the ceiling here, in the roof of the dome. That’s typically … if we’re in an open air stadium, that’s Mike Napoli’s ball, all the way. And I don’t think Pedey tracked it as well. I’m not pointing fingers or looking for alibis or excuses. It was a play that was not executed completely, as we know. Unfortunately, like I said, it was the difference in last night’s game.”
How do you handle the recent rough stretch?
“Here’s the thing, Michael. In this stretch, I think it’s important to remain consistent. It’s not to show that you’re going to revamp things completely, and then, that sends a mixed message. I’m more about talking to individuals. There might be a point in time where we need to discuss things as a group. But we reinforce what our strengths are and what our approach is going to be prior to every series in our advance series in our preparations for that given club. I think the attitude of our club, our team, is still consistent as it was in April when things were falling our way, and yet, we’ve not fired on all cylinders in the three areas, pitching, defense and offensively, as we had done in the first month of the season. We continue to create opportunities, even though from the second through the sixth inning last night, there were limited if any opportunities. And then, when we do, we line out to first base. This is part of the game. To say it’s evening out, that might be one thing. But we’re not the type in here just to slough if off as that. We continue to work at not only our preparation but how we go out and compete in given situations. Could there be a thought from our guys to try and do a little bit more because we’re in a little bit of a rut right now? Yeah. I think that’s human nature. But at the same time, this is a group we believe in, and I like our team. It’s a matter of consistency inside of those situations that are make or break on a given night.”
Of those three things you mentioned — pitching, defense and offense — which concerns you the most right now?
“If you were to ask me in April, I’d say, ‘We look to be strong in all three areas.’ And yet, we’ve had some personnel changes that have put some guys in different roles. But that doesn’t change our expectations, and I think that’s the message that is continually reinforced here: Our expectation is to compete and win this division. That goes unabated. That remains consistent. We’re in a little bit of a funk offensively. [Earlier in the season], we drew a high number of walks. We had that one through nine approach. When frustration sets in, we might come out of that a little bit. We have not been as consistent in the rotation as we were through that first month. I don’t know that you can single out any one area. We just need to be slightly better in all three.”
On his thoughts on the Dan Shaughnessy column on David Ortiz:
“I haven’t said anything to Dan. I’ve talked to David about it, in just more than anything to let him vent and get it off his chest. I think the one thing for the player in a situation like this is that there’s a system in place that is very thorough. It is very comprehensive. And even, by David’s admission, one that has seen him tested a number of times already this year. Once that has the initial reaction — and I think David has done a good job putting this behind him, just to go out and continue to perform as he’s capable of. And that means getting back to the work and staying with the work. That’s what made him the hitter he is. And that goes on daily. When the article came out, people were asking me what my response was to it. And I think if people saw the work he puts in and the way he goes about his BP, which to me is the reason why he’s become a better hitter as he’s gotten older. He knows himself better and he knows what opposing pitchers are trying to do to him. He more readily identifies sequences and way pitchers are going about it. And he takes what they are giving him. To me, that’s why he’s performed as well as he has since he came back.”
On Ortiz talking about a new injury:
“He felt some discomfort in the left rib cage, the left oblique area. It wasn’t to the point of keeping him out. There was a swing in the Saturday game, the last homestand, the last series we played at home, when he finished the swing he kind of rubbed his left side. I asked him in between at-bats if he was still good-to-go, but precautionary, we sat him on Sunday to take advantage of the off-day Monday as well to give him two days down. But the way he swung the bat last night, there’s no lingering affects. He’s back in there tonight.”
On what a manager can do to shake a team out of a slump — considered juggling the lineup or shaking up the rotation?
“Well, we do change the lineup based on the matchups. That’s where you see Nava and Gomes sharing that duty in left field, left-handed, right-handed. Saltalamacchia is back in there tonight. As far as the overall batting order, I think we’re still in that part of the year where we’re trying to maintain continuity and not just reactionary moves because we’ve scuffled a little bit as of late. That might be coming, but I think right now, I think it’s important for everybody in our clubhouse to know there’s stability, no one is panicking. And we’re going through a spell right now, where, you know what? We have to execute in those given moments.”
Injury update on Andrew Bailey:
“He threw a very good bullpen yesterday. He’ll throw to hitters here, tomorrow, early afternoon, in a simulated game situation just to see some hitters and try and create some additional adrenaline. After tomorrow, we’ll determine if it’s best served for everyone — most importantly, Andrew — to get a rehab appearance before he comes back to us. We’re thinking at the latest, it’d be Monday when he would rejoin us, in Chicago.”