WEEI.com will continue to offer daily insight and analysis regarding options that may be available to the Patriots when it comes to the 2014 NFL draft. Here is one is a series of profiles of players who could be on the board when it’€™s time for the Patriots to make a selection.

Will Sutton (AP)

Will Sutton had a dip in production in 2013 after a dominant 2012 season that culminated with him being a consensus All-American. (AP)

WILL SUTTON 

Position: Defensive tackle

School: Arizona State

Height: 6-foot-1

Weight: 305 pounds

Achievements: 2013 first-team All-American, 2013 Pac-12 Defensive Player of the Year, 2013 first-team All-Pac-12, 2012 consensus All-American, 2012 Pac-12 Defensive Player of the Year, 2012 first-team All-Pac-12

What he brings: Sutton is a well-rounded player who has good awareness, short-area quickness, and decent strength. He’€™s noted for having quick feet and good initial burst. Sutton upped his weight during 2013, getting up to 305 pounds. At 6-1, he is considered undersized for defensive tackle. He has short arms and can get winded quickly.

Where the Patriots could get him: Rounds 3-4

Notes: Sutton saw a dip in production from 2012 (12 sacks and 23.5 tackles for losses) to 2013 (four sacks and 13.5 tackles for losses). He started 38 of 39 games in his last three seasons. … He had a forgettable Senior Bowl and did not impress at Arizona State’s pro day. … He missed the entire 2010 season due to being academically ineligible. … Sutton’s father, Mickey Sutton, played in the NFL for five seasons with the Rams, Packers and Bills as a cornerback and punt returner.

Related articles:

NFL.com: Draft stock of Arizona State’s Will Sutton heading downward

ArizonaCentral.com: ASU’s Will Sutton hopes to make up for lost season

FanSided.com: Will Sutton’€™s weight gain results in sloppy Senior Bowl practices

Video: Here are Sutton’s highlights against Texas Tech during the 2013 Holiday Bowl. 

Blog Author: 
Arjuna Ramgopal
It looks like Bill Belichick's proposal to extend the goal posts is going to pass. (AP)

It looks like Bill Belichick‘s proposal to extend the goal posts is going to pass. (AP)

ORLANDO — A few picked-up pieces to report from the NFL’s annual meetings in Central Florida:

1. The proposal to extend the goal posts by an extra five feet “seems likely to pass” when voted on Wednesday, according to Judy Battista of NFL.com. An initiative sponsored by Bill Belichick and the Patriots, the coach said Tuesday that the idea of doing it certainly seems like a no-brainer. “Virtually every kicker at the combine can kick them over the top of the goal posts [and] some of those guys aren’€™t even going to be in the league,” Belichick said Tuesday morning when asked about the idea. “I’€™d say every kicker can do that.” In addition, the other three proposals proposed by the Patriots are also scheduled to be voted on by the owners Wednesday.

2. In other end-zone related news, the league announced Tuesday it will penalize players who dunk on the goal posts in 2014. In the past, the league has cracked down on group celebrations, as well as using the football as a prop, so it would appear that this is the next step in the process. In addition, it was announced Tuesday that the NFL officiating department will help referees rule on instant replay reviews starting next season. Referees will now be allowed to consult with director of officiating Dean Blandino and his staff — who will be monitoring games from the league offices in New York — to help determine whether a call should be upheld or overturned.

3. This doesn’t have anything to do with the goings on in Florida, but according to a league source, wide receiver and special teams coaches from New England were in Ann Arbor on Tuesday to work out wide receiver Jeremy Gallon. The 5-foot-8, 187-pound Gallon has put up impressive numbers over the last two years with the Wolverines, including 89 catches for 1,373 yards and nine touchdowns in 2013. He also posted good numbers as a return man, compiling 589 yards on 27 kick returns in 2010, and 192 yards on 31 punt returns in 2011.

4. Broncos coach John Fox was asked about the courtship process that brought former Patriots cornerback Aqib Talib to Denver, as well as comment on his thoughts on Talib as a player.

“œWe had an offer on the table to [Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie]. They were working through it. I don’€™t get involved in this stuff’€”this is agents and [Director of Football Administration] Mike Sullivan. It’€™s scholarships with price tags,” Fox said. “We obviously are an appealing place but the reality is it comes down to the contract, usually. We were all over that and then it flipped and we were very pleased to get Aqib.”

On Talib as a player: “€œHe’€™s long, he’€™s fast, he’€™s quick, he’€™s tough. The only real negative is he had some off-the-field issues early in his career. I knew him even when I was in Carolina and he was in Tampa. I knew their coaches there pretty well. You get a pretty good feedback on players when you’€™re in the division’€”even on other teams. I knew how he grew, got married, started a family and matured.”

5. Reports continue to link running back Maurice Jones-Drew to the Patriots, with one story saying that Jones-Drew was going meet with the Patriots, Steelers, Dolphins and Jets this week in Orlando. (Jones-Drew has already apparently met with Pittsburgh, but has not received an offer from the Steelers.) It remains to be seen how all of this will play out — given the Patriots depth at running back, as well as the current state of the market, you would have to think they’d be more inclined to bring back LeGarrette Blount at a cut rate price instead of likely investing more in Jones-Drew. (Jones-Drew could also sit out until the summer to see if the market shifts and he’s able to play one team against each other in hopes of reaching the reported $3 million annually he’s seeking.) But it’s certainly a situation that bears watching going forward for Patriots fans — even if he doesn’t land in New England, two of the three other teams reportedly in the hunt for the diminutive back are in the division.

Blog Author: 
Christopher Price
Tom Curran calls the show to discuss the Vince Wilfork contract situation. After texting with Vince this morning, Curran says that Vince's camp is possibly trying to put the "genie back in the lamp" and that the possibility of the Pro Bowl DT returning to the team has improved.

ORLANDO — Patriots coach Bill Belichick refuted the idea Tuesday that the Patriots have acted inappropriately when it comes to injury reports.

After they signed elsewhere as free agents this month, former Patriots Aqib Talib and Brandon Spikes both hinted that New England can play fast and loose with injury information. Spikes said the Patriots decision to put him on injured reserve at the end of the 2013 season was a ‘€œfalse report,’€ and added ‘€œthat’€™s just how things go’€ in Foxboro when it comes to injuries.

As for Talib, he said he was listed with a hip injury, but in truth, it was a quad issue.

‘€œThe Patriots have their way of reporting stuff, but I haven’€™t had a hip problem since Tampa,”€ Talib said after signing with the Broncos. ‘€œThe injury I had was actually a quad injury. It was reported as a hip injury … but that’€™s how [the Patriots] do things.”

Asked Tuesday morning at the league meetings if the Patriots falsified injury reports, Belichick quickly replied.

“€œI don’€™t agree with that,” Belichick said. “No. Never.”

Blog Author: 
Christopher Price

ORLANDO — Patriots coach Bill Belichick made some news this week at the league meetings with four proposed rules changes, and he talked about all four Tuesday morning during the AFC coaches breakfast.

– Moving the line of scrimmage for point-after attempts out to the 25-yard line.

“€œI think there are other people that voiced a similar opinion to mine, but again, there was no proposal from the Competition Committee for years. I mean, it’€™s been two decades, and the extra point conversion percentage is over 98 percent. Six of the last nine years, it’€™s been over 99 percent. In the last decade, there hasn’€™t been a field goal under 20 yards that’€™s been missed in 10 years. So, when the extra point was part of the game originally,, we had players in other positions who were kicking, surfaces were a lot less ideal than what they are now. It was a tougher play. Now, we’€™ve made it a non-play, and I don’€™t think non-plays are good for the game. Just like I don’€™t think putting the ball on the 40-yard line and kicking into the end zone, or even putting on the 35, and having over 50 percent touchback rate. I don’€™t think that’€™s an exciting play. I can’€™t imagine the fans waiting to see a 99 percent extra point, and then an over 50 percent touchback play. Personally, I don’€™t think that’€™s great for the game.”

– The extension of the goal posts.

“Certainly, the goal posts are outdated. Virtually every kicker at the combine can kick them over the top of the goal posts [and] some of those guys aren’€™t even going to be in the league. I’€™d say every kicker can do that.”

– Make every play — except scoring plays — reviewable.

“I’€™m not proposing more challenges. All I’€™m saying is, as a coach, if you want to challenge a play, I think you should be able to challenge it. And why does it have to be limited to, I don’€™t know, there’€™s four or five pages in the rules book of plays that can be challenged, and now this year there are more proposals to amend that probably because of one or two plays that happened in the league last year. I think eventually, each year, there’€™s going to be some other circumstance, situation that comes up and we’€™re gonna want to add that. I mean it’€™s four to five pages of plays that challenge procedure. Every year it gets amended and it’€™s hard to keep it straight. I can’€™t get it right. We have a coach that’€™s responsible for that on game day to know exactly’€¦ I don’€™t know how the fans could possibly get it right if the coaches can’€™t get it right. For the officials themselves, it’€™s challenging. I think it simplifies it. And I understand it’€™s a judgment call. So, if I throw a challenge on an offensive holding play and they look at it, and they don’€™t think it’€™s holding, I lose the challenge. But if it’€™s an egregious play, I don’€™t see why it should not be allowed to be challenged when it affects the outcome of the game. I think we can find multiple, multiple examples of plays for example where the offense isn’€™t set, that if the officials could look at it, it’€™s very clear that they’€™re not set, that would nullify what subsequently happened. I can think of many situations where that would have affected the outcome of the game. So, why plays like that can’€™t be challenged, why other plays can’€™t be challenged, I think is’€¦ if we fundamentally want to try to get the games right and the plays right, then I don’€™t see why they should be excluded. Even though they’€™re judgment calls, but if you’€™re willing to use a timeout on that, I think you should be able to do that. It’€™s not going to slow the game down. It’€™s no different than if you challenged another play. So, I’€™m not looking for more challenges or anything else, just if you think it was a call that was missed, that you should have the opportunity to have the officials review it. That’€™s all. I don’€™t know if anybody agrees with that or not, but that’€™s the proposal.”

– The addition of cameras near the end zone to better determine whether or not the ball has crossed the plane of the end zone.

“The camera idea we’€™ve been talking about for years, but that’€™s never been formally discussed by the membership, so things like that. … We just spent, whatever it was, how many millions of dollars on the replay system. I mean, there’€™s a thousand cameras in every stadium, so that if somebody spills a beer on somebody, we have it on record, right? Maybe we could have a bake sale. Raise some money for the cameras. Do a car wash.”

Blog Author: 
Christopher Price

ORLANDO — Patriots coach Bill Belichick deferred all questions on the status of defensive lineman Vince Wilfork Tuesday, saying that, “if you have any questions about Vince, you should ask Vince.”

WEEI.com will continue to offer daily insight and analysis regarding options that may be available to the Patriots when it comes to the 2014 NFL draft. Here is one in a series of profiles of players who could be on the board when it’€™s time for the Patriots to make a selection.

Jarvis Landry (AP)

Jarvis Landry had a productive junior season at LSU in 2013 but did not impress at the NFL combine. (AP)

JARVIS LANDRY

Position: Wide receiver

School: LSU

Height: 5-foot-11

Weight: 205 pounds

Achievements: 2013 second-team All-SEC selection (Associated Press, coaches)

What he brings: Scouts say that Landry has strong reflexes and ball-handling skills. While he has good size and speed, the general feeling is that Landry needs to bulk up more. He only started in 12 games at the college level. He did not help his cause at the NFL combine, posting the slowest 40-yard dash time of all wide receivers at 4.77 seconds. He attributed the slow performance to a right hamstring injury that he suffered during the sprint.

Where the Patriots could get him: Rounds 2-3

Notes: Landry, 21, had five 100-yard games as a junior in 2013, finishing the season with 77 receptions for 1,193 yards and 10 touchdowns. He is considered one of the top wide receivers in LSU’€™s history with 137 catches for 1,809 yards and 15 touchdowns in 40 games. … As a senior at Lutcher (La.) High School in 2011, Landry set a record at the Under Armour All-America Game with eight receptions, good for 70 yards and a touchdown.

Related articles:

The Advocate: Slow 40 time might not hurt Jarvis Landry in draft

SI.com: Odell Beckham Jr., Jarvis Landry bring new level of LSU excellence to 2014 NFL draft

The Times-Picayune: What the national media are saying about LSU draft prospects

Video: Here is a video highlighting Landry’s career with LSU

Blog Author: 
Meredith Perri

ORLANDO — Patriots coach Bill Belichick deferred all questions on the status of defensive lineman Vince Wilfork Tuesday, saying that, “if you have any questions about Vince, you should ask Vince.”

Wilfork reportedly requested his release earlier this month, and a story from the Boston Herald Monday indicated he had taken down his nameplate and cleaned out his locker at Gillette Stadium. While owner Robert Kraft seemed to sound an optimistic note about Wilfork’s status on Monday, Belichick wouldn’t comment on the matter on Tuesday.

“I’€™m not going to talk about anything with any of our specific players, I’€™m not going to get into that,” Belichick said when quizzed about Wilfork during the AFC coaches breakfast at the league meetings. ‘€œIf you have any questions about Vince, you should ask Vince, or (questions about) any other players, you should talk to those players.

‘€œYou need to talk to him about any of those statements,” he added when pressed further on Wilfork. “I think you should verify first.’€

For more Patriots news, check out weei.com/patriots.

Blog Author: 
Christopher Price

ORLANDO — Patriots coach Bill Belichick said Tuesday he’s “looking forward” to the chance to work with veteran cornerback Darrelle Revis.

Bill Belichick at the AFC coaches breakfast Tuesday morning. (Photo courtesy Erik Scalavino, Patriots Football Weekly)

Bill Belichick at the AFC coaches breakfast Tuesday morning. (Photo courtesy Erik Scalavino, Patriots Football Weekly)

ORLANDO — Patriots coach Bill Belichick said Tuesday he’s “looking forward” to the chance to work with veteran cornerback Darrelle Revis.

Speaking at the AFC coaches breakfast at the annual meetings, Belichick didn’t sound “super excited” like owner Robert Kraft did on Monday when talking about the free agent haul, but was upbeat when speaking about the pickup of Revis.

“I think he’€™ll help our team,” Belichick said of Revis, who was signed as a free agent earlier this month. “He’€™s a good player (who) does a lot of things well. We’re looking forward to working with him.”

Belichick acknowledged that Revis was a traditional free agent pickup, saying that the Patriots believed the veteran cornerback was a “potential release,” but they weren’t 100 percent sure until Tampa Bay officially cut him loose.

“We try to keep tabs on all the players — we know the ones that are potentially (unrestricted free agents) going into the process, we know guys that are potentially non-tendered players,” Belichick said. “Some of those guys get signed back, some of them get tendered, some guys we think are gonna get tendered don’€™t get tendered — there’€™s a little bit of movement there at the end and then some players get released.

“We thought he was a potential release, but we didn’€™t know that. They could’€™ve kept him, but they didn’€™t, so when they didn’€™t, that’€™s the process,” he added. “You never know exactly how free agency is going to go — there’€™s always twists and turns.

“Darrelle is a good player. We’€™ll see how it comes together with us, what his role is and how exactly he fits in our scheme and so forth,” Belichick added. “We’€™ll just have to see how that comes together.”

Belichick also touched on the acquisition of free agents Brandon Browner and Brandon LaFell.

“He was a productive player in Carolina (and) had some skills that we liked when he was coming out of LSU. We’€™ll see how it goes,” Belichick said of LaFell. “Obviously, (we) felt he was a good player and that’€™s why we signed him.”

On Browner: “Rare size for a corner. … Obviously, there’€™s a lot of things that we liked about it or we wouldn’€™t have signed him. It’s the same thing when we draft a player — we have to work with him, have them put it together and see how it comes together with that player on our team. But that’€™s a process we have to go through. Obviously, there’€™s things we liked, or we wouldn’€™t have signed him.”

For more Patriots news, check out weei.com/patriots.

Blog Author: 
Christopher Price