Magnificent 7: On Hall of Fame weekend, these current and former Patriots deserve consideration for Canton

August 07, 2016 - 2:37 pm
Categories: 

[caption id="attachment_109788" align="alignright" width="350"]Ty Law deserves Hall of Fame consideration.  (Tim Bradbury/Getty Images) Ty Law deserves Hall of Fame consideration. (Tim Bradbury/Getty Images)[/caption] On Hall of Fame weekend, here are seven current and former Patriots who deserve to be a part of the conversation when it comes to Canton. Bill Belichick: There will be some critics who don't agree, but as his boat reminds us, Belichick has won four titles as a head coach and two as an assistant. That's six rings. SIX. That should be enough to gain entry on the first ballot, critics be damned. Tom Brady: There will inevitably be some Deflategate drama when his name is raised, but four Super Bowl wins and a pair of MVPs should be enough to get him through on the first ballot. Ty Law: I wasn't a big believer in the possibility of a Law candidacy for the Hall. But a closer look at the numbers over the last few seasons reveals the fact that he's at least worthy of a debate. His resume is pretty impressive, especially when stacked against others in Canton: Three Super Bowl rings, two All-Pro nods and 53 career picks, which puts him 24th on the all-time list. He was a semifinalist last year, but might need an advocate — like Ron Borges, who worked hard to get Andre Tippett in — if he wants to make it. Adam Vinatieri: The automatic default is to reject the idea of a kicker in the Hall of Fame. But when it comes to Vinatieri, it's hard to go against him. The best big game kicker of his generation, Vinatieri has played in five Super Bowls and won four rings. Two Super Bowl titles were ultimately decided on the strength of his right leg. When all is said and done, he should become the second pure kicker to reach the Hall. (Jan Stenrud is the only pure placekicker in the Hall of Fame. George Blanda and Lou Groza are also in Canton, but also did other things in addition to their work as kickers.) Randy Moss: If Moss doesn't get in, they should shut the place down. He'€™s second all-time in receiving touchdowns with 156 (trailing only Jerry Rice), third in all-time receiving yards (behind Rice and Terrell Owens) and 11th on the list of all-time catches (982). He's got his detractors — he doesn't have a signature moment, which many Hall voters require when it comes to wide receiver — but come on. He was an absolutely transformative presence for a decade. Vince Wilfork: We've been on this for a while now, but it's worth reiterating that because of his longevity and his track record as an absolutely vital part of a consistently good-to-great team over the course of a decade, he deserves a spot in the discussion when his time comes. The voters aren't crazy about interior defensive linemen who don't pile up sack numbers — most of the linemen who have gotten a spot have either been big sack guys or other defensive ends — and so he's probably a long shot. (Nose tackles are few and far between.) As a result, Like Law, Wilfork probably needs to have someone advocating for him in the room when he comes up for discussion. Gino Cappelletti: One of the best players of his era, Cappelletti played wide receiver and kicker for the Patriots for 10 years, and led the American Football League in scoring five times. (He retired as the AFL's all-time leading scorer with 1,130 points.) The 1964 AFL Most Valuable Player played receiver and kicker, he was the face of the franchise throughout the 1960s, and had one of the most memorable careers of any of the old AFL stars. Also worthy of consideration but failed to make the cut here for various reasons: Rob Gronkowski (who could be on the list sooner rather than later if he continues on his current path for another couple of years), Willie McGinest, Wes Welker, Rodney Harrison, Richard Seymour.

Comments ()